The requirements aren't clear to me. Most certainly, Drools is suitable for deriving conclusion from the data. But it will not derive the *rules* for you. -W
On 06/12/2012, Andreas Höhmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like try to create an technical drawing with rules. > > I have an chessboard with cells. Depending on some "Data Driven" Rules the > cells should be filled with technical symbols. The placement rules are > bidirectional, > i.e. if level 4 defines 2 horizontal elements, a rule should say "level 2 > depends on level 4", > so level 2 needs also 2 elements, another rule: level 1 should group always > 2 elements of > level 2, so if level 2 contains 10 elements (maybe level 4 triggered this) > then level 0 > should have 5 elements, each element "connected" with two elements from > level 2 and so on > > <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4021116/rulebasedtechnicaldrawing.png> > > > Is drools a good / practical ways to do such things? > > Kind Regards > Andreas > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Newbie-question-rule-based-technical-drawing-tp4021116.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
