On 14 Dec 2012, at 14:10, m11 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi , > > I re ran the test using drools 5.4.0 too, same problem. In the majority of > our cases Property Reactive Facts work really well. Not using this feature > is not really an option that we would like to take as we would have to > rewrite the rules. We have thousands of rules. > > Can you please let me know the process for getting this bug fixed in drools? Contact Red Hat for support subscription information, which will give you a direct line to RHT product management, for bug escalation. [email protected] http://blog.athico.com/2011/04/drools-jbpm-community-versus-product.html
I also wrote a page on how to submit unit tests and bug fixes: http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html Mark > > I would like to propagate this issue to the engineering team and for them to > fix the bug in the next release. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/same-criteria-across-multiple-rules-cancels-activation-with-Property-Reactive-Facts-tp4021204p4021208.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
