On 1 Feb 2013, at 13:59, Grant Rettke <gret...@acm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: >> It was only a POC that partially worked, and then stopped working, so I >> removed it. No one was using it, or came forward to help develop it, so >> figured it was kinder to put it >> out of its misery. > > I see. How much interest was there in it? zip, zilch, nadda, zero :) > Were there any big lessons > learned via the attempt? Eg: that is inherently a good or bad idea or > that Drools Expert is suited well for it or it was a bad hack or > anything? It worked well enough. It was a translator. It took CLP and converted it to DRL for execution. We further added a simple shell, so it worked like clips shell. > > Having an OSS Java compatible version of CLIPS would be pretty > interesting; That's what I thought at the time, but no one showed any interest. > not sure there is enough interest in it though to warrant > the investment in time and effort vs licensing JESS. If there was more interest, we would have continued to develop it.
I think at best it might be worth resurrecting as purely a CLP to DRL translator utility. Mark > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
