Thanks for reporting, the ConditionalBranchDescr should be managed by verifier. I'll create a JIRA for this and make sure it's included in 5.6.
On 05/02/2013 11:51 AM, rswanson wrote: > Using 5.5.0.Final, I just started trying to use the verifier and get a number > of these exceptions: > > org.drools.verifier.visitor.UnknownDescriptionException: Descr ( class > org.drools.lang.descr.ConditionalBranchDescr ) is unknown to drools > verifier. > at > org.drools.verifier.visitor.RuleDescrVisitor.visit(RuleDescrVisitor.java:109) > at > org.drools.verifier.visitor.ConditionalElementDescrVisitor.visit(ConditionalElementDescrVisitor.java:46) > at > org.drools.verifier.visitor.RuleDescrVisitor.visitAndDescr(RuleDescrVisitor.java:233) > at > org.drools.verifier.visitor.RuleDescrVisitor.visitRuleDescr(RuleDescrVisitor.java:80) > at > org.drools.verifier.visitor.PackageDescrVisitor.visitRuleDescr(PackageDescrVisitor.java:118) > at > org.drools.verifier.visitor.PackageDescrVisitor.visitRules(PackageDescrVisitor.java:111) > at > org.drools.verifier.visitor.PackageDescrVisitor.visitPackageDescr(PackageDescrVisitor.java:63) > at > org.drools.verifier.builder.VerifierImpl.addPackageDescr(VerifierImpl.java:90) > at > org.drools.verifier.builder.VerifierImpl.addResourcesToVerify(VerifierImpl.java:230) > > I'm guessing these are being caused by my use of the new 'Conditional named > consequences' feature. Any idea if this will be supported in the upcoming > 5.6 release? > > Thanks, > Roger > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Guvnor-Testing-rules-tp4023594p4023638.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
