On 24 May 2013, at 08:51, ronan.quintin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > First of all i have to appologise for this horrible joke, but i think you > understand that i'm interrested in shadow facts. > I read that theses lazy facts proxy were introduced in Drools 4 in order to > make the rule engine/working memory consistent. I have some questions about > the general implentation of shadow facts in drools 5.4 : They did exist in 4, we had a similar engine to Jess then. http://blog.athico.com/2008/02/shadow-facts-what-you-always-wanted-to.html They are no longer needed in 5, due to changes in our rete algorithm. See Assymetrical Rete algorithm: http://blog.athico.com/2008/07/drools-50-m1-new-and-noteworthy.html http://blog.athico.com/2008/10/symmetrical-and-asymmetrical-rete.html http://blog.athico.com/2010/01/rete-and-true-modify.html > - Did the shadow facts been implemented since version 4, or was it earlyier? > - Are the shadow facts still implemented in drools 5.4 final? > - How the mapping between the fact fields and the proxy fields is > implemented ? By this i want to know all fields are copy when the fact is > insert into the session. > - Is there the possibility to disable shadow facts ? Don't need to, they are gone. > > > You have to know that we get the knowledgeBase through a knowledgeAgent > which > > Thank you. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Shadow-fax-tp4023948.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
