Problem solved...was not an issue with Accumulate. It was an issue with my understanding of decision tables.
I had missed the all important "update" off the action of the decision table. This lead to some peculiar behavior where println the fact worked fine, but executing a rule on the fact took the previous value of the fact. I am assuming this is down to the way the rules engine works when firing rules as opposed to simply retrieving values? Regardless the issue is resolved, thanks for your help (and patience) as always. Steve -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Issue-with-simple-accumulate-sum-rule-tp4025933p4025986.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
