On 25-10-13 12:50, sirinath wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to provide more out of the box optimisers and solvers as part > of OptaPlanner. Yes, we're trying to add more every major release. For 6.1 we 'll probably add the CH's "cheapest insertion" and "regret insertion". If you want to add one yourself, start by looking at DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase.java. > > Also add functionality for simulations (Monte Carlo) which would be a good > addition and fit. Simulation support would be great indeed - but the requirements aren't clearly definied yet (feedback, examples or use cases welcome).
It's already possible to do simulation + optimization by doing the simulation inside the score function (for example by running a monte carlo simulation) and doing the optimization with optaplanner. drools-chance (very experimental currently) has a lot of constructs that can help in simulation (bayes stuff etc). > > Suminda > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Monte-Carlo-and-additional-Optimisers-for-OptaPlanner-tp4026495.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
