On 21/02/2014, droolster <quant.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > @laune, > > I don't want to make this thread longer than it already is but...
You can always start a new one ;-) > > 1. If you don't trust the Drools Rete Viewer, why is it there in the plugin > and why are Rete graphs displayed in the documentation? If it is not > trustworthy, then it's misleading. (I'm assuming you are on the Drools dev. > team). It may help to understand beginners to obtain an inkling of the way a Rete is built. I've never read or heard that it is a sort of "graphic dump" of the harsh reality. (Digging through the intricacies of the various network node classes might show you what I mean.) I'd say, it's an "educational toy". (BTW: wrong assumption.) > > 2. I said in my post "one of the assurances...". We do have JUnit tests in > place. But it was source of confusion that the Rete viewer was complaining > that the graph was broken (in the properties tab, there was null for one of > nodes) but the rule's were evaluating fine. It's not exactly a glowing > advert for Drools Expert is it? Well, I've made my point. JUnit is OK, and there are other ways. - There were other troubles that worried me much more than a NPE in a toy. -W > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/in-operator-breaking-the-Rete-Tree-tp4028148p4028235.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
