We could reproduce the issue, it's now in a unit test: https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/pull/317/files
Thanks for reporting this!! Davide On 02/28/2014 12:44 AM, mikerod wrote: > I made a basic jar that only depends on Drools. > > All the rules do is output to standard out to demonstrate. > This can just be ran with: > `mvn exec:java -Dexec.mainClass="example.drools.TestingNestedNegation"` > > This is with v6.0.1.Final; so switching this in the pom.xml to 5.6.0.Final, > for example, will cause the different behavior between the versions i.e. > changing <drools.version>6.0.1.Final</drools.version> in pom.xml . > > @Mark I looked at the link and he had a zip file. I'm guessing a jar with a > main class in it is sufficient? drools-example-tests-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4028398/drools-example-tests-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar> > > > Also, I am still using the now, legacy API for the kb and Stateful session. > I tried to add the logback.xml config file, but it doesn't seem to work > quite so simply there. That is likely due to me not reading up on the new > API yet... I'm hoping the initial uplift to v6.x can just be to the legacy > API and migrate over later on. > > I don't think the API choice would make this behavioral change in the rules > nonetheless. > > Let me know what else would be helpful. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Nested-negation-constraints-behavior-change-from-Drools-5-x-to-6-x-tp4028390p4028398.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
