That is correct and that is my thought. My company I feel likes to over complicate things at times. My thought would be to use drools queries to handle the searching of previous cases for the solution. Does that seem like a reasonable approach?
laune wrote > CBR as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case-based_reasoning? > > If the number of identical variables, added with weights, is the > target function, a simple search strategy should be sufficient for > finding the best past case. > > -W > > > On 18/03/2014, gboro54 < > gboro54@ > > wrote: >> This sounds like something that could be accomplished with Planner. Is >> that >> the case or am I completely off the mark here? My company is looking at >> technologies to do case base planning and since we already use drools for >> other business rules figure I would poke around >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Case-Based-Reasoning-tp4028784.html >> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> > rules-users@.jboss >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@.jboss > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Case-Based-Reasoning-tp4028784p4028786.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
