We are still working on this, we’ve found a number of related points, as we are doing a full audit of the code. We’ll post as soon as we have the fixes available in a nightly build, so that people can test.
Mark On 29 Mar 2014, at 12:50, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: > Mario has found an issue at a sync point, which can happen if it’s trying to > schedule a timer at the same time that it’s firing that same timer from an > update. We are trying to resolve that now. See lines 121 and 394, which later > impacts lines 289 and 330. > https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/core/phreak/PhreakTimerNode.java > > Once we have this solved, we should have expected behaviour. Hopefully you > can try this in the next 6.1 beta, in 2 weeks time. > > Mark > On 29 Mar 2014, at 09:00, Vieri <vieri.emili...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mark, >> thanks for your update. >> I don't know if this can help, but I added a simple AgendaEventListener to >> the test case and it seems that at some point drools stops matching the >> "Create event" rule, while facts (well, events) are still inserted and other >> rules are triggered properly. >> Vieri >> >> >> >> On 28 March 2014 16:57, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: >> we’ve being auditing the code here, and we’ve found an issue on what happens >> when a rule is re-matched and the timer updated. Mario is addressing this >> now, and also re-viewing dropping of output. He’ll post with an update soon. >> >> Mark >> On 25 Mar 2014, at 16:09, Vieri <vieri.emili...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> First of all, thanks for the support. >>> Mario, I confirm that the case you provided works fine also at my side. >>> Still, have you tried my first example (using the cron directly to the >>> counting rule)? Can you confirm it is not working, since this was my first >>> concern? >>> As I said in the previous post, using the CronTrigger pattern greatly >>> improves stability (I managed to run it at 500 eps), but it is not >>> resolutive. >>> Adding a few rules, it's enough to go back to instability. >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> >> >> -- >> Vieri Emiliani >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
