If it’s a new Drools architecture, I’d recommend you use 6.1 beta3. We use GIT for source and Maven for artefacts. You an setup different maven repo’s for dev, stage and prod and create a copy routine to move the jars between the environments (or use a tool like sonatype).
Mark On 11 May 2014, at 05:35, Branham, Jeremy [HR] <jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com> wrote: > I am planning a new Drools architecture, and looking for the best way to > migrate Drools rules through a series of environments. > Our typical SDLC involves an initial DEV environment, then migrating to one > of several TEST environments, then to an ORT environment, then finally to a > PROD environment. > > The question has been asked a couple times, looking through the mail > archives, but I’m curious if there have been any recent changes that could > improve the development lifecycle. > I’ve read we could just use the import/export function, or the following two > options - > > Mentions Jackrabbit > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.drools.user/25097/match=production+migration > > Using the Rest interface > https://community.jboss.org/wiki/PublishDroolsartifactsfromaproductionenvironment > > Anything else, or any best practice for this? > > Thanks! > > > Jeremy D. Branham > Technology Architect > Sprint University Performance Support > Fort Worth, TX | Tel: **DOTNET > Office: +1 (972) 405-2970| Mobile: +1 (817) 791-1627 > > > > > This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary information intended for the sole > use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of the > message. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
