If you look to my example posted previously there are no issues. Can you make a test using just Apache Karaf 2.3.x with Drools 6.1.0.Beta3 and tell me what happen. Which JDK do you sue ?
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Ephemeris Lappis < ephemeris.lap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello. > > Although without much conviction, I've tried the > "Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: J2SE-1.7", but it doesn't change the > compilation level of the rules... > > As I said in a previous answer, I don't know exactly how to do it, but I > think the solution may be in the way that Drools takes the classloader > passed by the application to have access to specific classes like the > usually imported beans used in the rules. Indeed, perhaps that instead of > using directly this classloader, for its tasks, among of them the rules > compilation, it should be possible to use some kind of enriched classloader > that carries all the Drools needed packages, and delegates application > classes resolution to the application's one. > > What do you think of that ? > > Regards. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-compilation-error-with-OSGi-integration-6-1-0-Beta3-tp4029601p4029635.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
