On 3 Jun 2014, at 13:16, Péter Gergely, Horváth <h.pe...@mailbox.hu> wrote:
> Hi All, > > I've been experimenting with agenda-group and ruleflow-group features and I > am now a bit confused. The documentation states that agenda-group and > ruleflow-group features have been merged, but I'm not sure how this relates > to activation groups. it doesn’t. That is a separate thing, and unchanged. > > ruleflow-groups used to be a rule-flow feature, driven by the .RF file, > requiring JBPM engine behind the scenes. Agenda-group work without the > presence of JBPM: does it mean we can use the RF file for visualizing the > agenda-groups as well? All it means is that the rule flow now calls setFocus() when it reaches a ruleflow-group. > > Could someone please shed some light on the differences between these > constructs? Which one is the currently recommended approach (when?) for > controlling rule execution flow? So an ruleflow-group and an agenda-group are now the same thing. RuleFlow is an additional thing to orchestrate the calling of the ruleflow/agenda-group. > > Thanks, > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
