Hi, I recall this email. After trying with more examples, I notice if I reverse the order, the non-dynamic salience will not work.
Thanks. Jinghai On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:03 AM, rjh <raojing...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I developed a system where dynamic salience for some particular rules > doesn't rules. However, it is very hard for me to create a simple test case > unless I publish the entire rule files. In the system, some rules using > dynamic salience work and some don't, but I don't know why. > > I debugged into the drools-core source code, and found out the following > code in branch 6.0.x. > ( > https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/6.0.x/drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/core/reteoo/PathMemory.java > ) > > Line 98 - org.drools.core.reteoo.PathMemory::doLinkRule > > int salience = ( rtn.getRule().getSalience() instanceof > MVELSalienceExpression) > ? 0 > : rtn.getRule().getSalience().getValue(null, > rtn.getRule(), wm); > > Line 113 - org.drools.core.reteoo.PathMemory::doUnlinkRule > > int salience = ( rtn.getRule().getSalience() instanceof > MVELSalienceExpression) > ? 0 > : rtn.getRule().getSalience().getValue(null, > rtn.getRule(), wm); > > I wonder if this is a bug that put the first value and the second value > reversed. At least I fixed my problem after reversing them. > > Thanks. > > Jinghai > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-problem-in-PathMemory-tp4030026.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
