Hello, Class "ProducerMasterForRules" isn't valid; it references "getPCuisines()" that isn't in the class.
Since your rule uses the affected public methods "getPrimaryCuisine()" and "getSecondaryCuisine()" can you provide the missing implementation? I could mock something up, but want to be sure to use exactly what you are. With kind regards, Mike On 12 July 2014 12:17, sumit dhaniya <sumitdhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Michael I really appreciate all the help from the forum and the time > invested by the people to answer the queries. > I'm working as a freelance developer so if support is something affordable > then please let me know. > > > > DRL :- > > > > 2.| 3.|import java.lang.Number;4. |import > com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.SearchContext;5.| import > com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.ProducerMasterForRules;6.|import > com.sophic.foodeemee.offers.dto.RuleFactor; 7.|8.|rule > "SecondaryCuisineRepeatUsage" 9.| dialect "mvel"10. | when11.| > $searchContext > : SearchContext( lastThreeCuisines != null ) 12.| > ProducerMasterForRules( > primaryCuisine != null , primaryCuisine != > $searchContext.lastThreeCuisines , secondaryCuisine != null , > secondaryCuisine == $searchContext.lastThreeCuisines ) 13.| > $secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor > : RuleFactor( )14.| then15.| > $secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor.setWeightageImpact( > -30 ); 16.| update( $secondaryCuisineRepeatUsageFactor );17.| end > > object models are attached. > > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Asking (at least) three questions at the same time on the same thread is >> really going to annoy people. >> >> It's the weekend; most people are not working and you are not paying for >> our support. >> >> When I am at my computer on Monday I will be happy to answer more. For >> now; please provide the DRL for the rule that does not reopen correctly and >> your object model. >> >> Sent on the move >> On 12 Jul 2014 10:54, "Sumit Dhaniya" <sumitdhan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I create the rule by comparing properties of two objects as shown in >>> image >>> attached. Till I don't close the window generated source looks fine but >>> when >>> I open this rule after closing it. >>> But when I open the rule next time it removes the highlighted condition >>> from >>> the rule and also removes them from drl. Just wondering is there anything >>> I'm doing wrong or issue is something else. >>> <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4030322/rule_snapshot.png> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/conditions-getting-removed-from-Guided-Rule-tp4030308p4030322.html >>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
