the updates just go through kie-ci, I’m assuming you are using this. I think you could mock this without Guvnor, by creating a temporary local m2_repo and add jars there. kie-ci will pick those up and try and apply them.
Mark On 8 Aug 2014, at 18:02, san_hegde <santhosh.he...@hp.com> wrote: > Actually during functional testing we want to test our service which in turn > calls rules and we want to test the service with changing rules. But we do > not want to change the rules in Guvnor rather we want to somehow mock it. > Means depending on our tests we want to use different modified rules. For > this if we can mock the session or guvnor or somehow so that we session can > return the mocked fact depending on our test. > > > > Thank you > > Santhosh Hegde A > > > > From: Stephen Masters [via Drools] [mailto:ml-node+[hidden email]] > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 9:10 PM > To: Ajekar, Santhosh Hegde (HP-IT) > Subject: Re: [rules-users] Mocking Guvnor > > > > Possibly also worth pointing out that inserting a fact and executing a > session do not connect to Guvnor anyway? > > > > Although, as Mike mentions, the simplest approach tends to be to create a > service which wraps knowledge base access and mock that. Although you could > also mock the session. > > > > Although, I must admit I’m not sure what question is being asked... > > > > Steve > > > > > > On 8 Aug 2014, at 13:07, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > I assume you have a service encapsulating your use of Drools? > > > > Why not mock this service to use an implementation that returns what you need? > > > > On 8 August 2014 03:13, san_hegde <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi , > > > > We have requirement where in during functional testing we do not want to > connect to Guvnor rather want to mock it. > > > > For example mocking could be like this. > > > > We send Fact object as input during calling > knowledgeSession.execute() method and in rule we update the result in that > fact object itself. So here can we mock the output fact object, so that > during functional testing we no need to connect to Guvnor rather mocked > result fact object is returned. > > > > > > Thank you > > Santhosh Hegde A > > > > View this message in context: Mocking Guvnor > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Mocking-Guvnor-tp4030601p4030608.html > > To start a new topic under Drools: User forum, email [hidden email] > To unsubscribe from Drools: User forum, click here. > NAML > > > View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] Mocking Guvnor > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
