On Monday, 22.06.2015 at 07:34, Antti Kantee wrote: > Come to think of it, I don't think I've ever tried to run both hw > and xen binaries built from the same tree, but just experience in > trying to build both gives a clue that it's not a good idea. > David's results seem to suggest that binaries built that way will > not run correctly, at least for Xen. They do work for hw, as far as > I've been able to observe, for whatever reason. > > I filed issue #35 and made the build script refuse to build multiple > platform/machine combos from the same sources until objdir builds > are supported.
I did try building and running hw + xen out of the same tree after you logged a commit implying it should work some time ago. It did appear to work, but then I didn't test it very hard. If you're going to be working on improving build-rr.sh, have you thought about how to specify the target CPU for the toolchain in a more user-friendly way than ACLFLAGS? Wouldn't something like build-rr.sh hw i686 and build-rr.sh hw x86_64 be "good enough"?
