On Friday, 03.07.2015 at 13:00, Antti Kantee wrote: > On 02/07/15 15:50, Martin Lucina wrote: > >On Thursday, 02.07.2015 at 13:11, Antti Kantee wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>At least the NetBSD cross-toolchain distinguishes between gcc and > >>clang in the cc binary name, i.e. arch--netbsd-gcc or > >>arch--netbsd-clang. Should we do the same? Obviously, it would > >>always be -gcc for now, before some kind soul comes up with clang > >>support, but at least we should be set later on. > > > >Yes, we should do the same and use -gcc. That is what a standard > >cross-toolchain does, and configure is trained to look for -gcc as well. > > Ok, done. -gcc was added (and -clang will be automagically dealt > with in case someone manages to add support for it some day). -cc > was removed.
Ack. Good. > I don't quite know what to do with -c++. It seems to be present for > example in the NetBSD xtoolchain along with -g++. For now, the > wrappers only generate -g++ (or -clang++). The wrapperizing should > also be made more accurate to generate those iff havecxx ... Most toolchains don't have a -c++, only a -g++, so I'd also not have one.
