On Sunday, 16.08.2015 at 23:38, Antti Kantee wrote: > So, if folks think that the new usage is better than the old usage, we > should go for it. If not, or even if ambivalent, we should seriously > consider if we can find better tools which allow us to to do what we want, > and evaluate the cost of moving from /bin/sh to that tool.
As I understand it from later comments in the Github issue (#40), Kevin has found a way to make this work without changing the rumprun syntax. Is there anything stopping that work being committed? (I've not reviewed the changes in detail, shout if you want me to.)
