On 29/09/15 14:40, Wei Liu wrote:
I didn't expect to be able to link ARM object to x86 stack. I was
talking more about what is the good practice to decide whether I should
put an object in my customised conf or explicitly link it against my
application code in my main build system.
For example, in my current code, I use rune like (in old syntax)
./rumpbake -c customised_conf xen_pv_qemu init_obj app_obj
init_obj is an object that contains code to bring up the platform to a
specific state.
With the new syntax, I guess you're advocating I put init_obj in
customised_conf.
All input files passed to rumpbake are expected to be "programs", i.e.
contain main(). Everything in the config file is expected to be a
"systems component" (global, if you want to think of it that way). I'll
admit, my formulation is not very precise, but I think you understand
what I mean.
