>
> - Docker themselves use The Update Framework in their tools. They had to
>> port it to Go because they're a Go shop. Also, they have a separate server
>> for storing all the TUF metadata called Notary. It does the job of doing
>> all the crypto stuff so that instead of doing distributed 'web of trust'
>> (passing public keys around), everything's done the under the auspices of
>> your Docker account.
>>
>
> Silly question (with a -- I hope -- silly answer): why not use the Go
> version?



I don't like Go.

Also, I have some vague notion that since Saltstack is in Python it might
be easier.

As the TUF reference implementation is in Python it seemed like a
no-brainer.


>
> - Just to be clear, the Docker tools aren't needed here on the client and
>> just the hypervisor is used to run the Node binary. This is off-topic but
>> what I want to do is then orchestrate the hypervisors using a tool like
>> Saltstack.
>>
>
> I think that subject is extremely on topic for the list ... and at the
> same time extremely off-topic.  As many know, I believe (because software
> development is all about religion) that drivers and Orchestrating Systems
> should be separate.  This project can't split itself into the orchestrating
> layer anymore, we're already too split into a billion different
> directions.  Any data that someone else can provide on if orchestrating
> system X works with Rumprun (or some other way of applying rump kernels)
> and what we can do to better support X is of great value.  I look forward
> to hearing about your experiments.
>

Things like Kubernetes and OpenStack make my head hurt. I can just about
understand Saltstack.

Reply via email to