On Thursday, 11.02.2016 at 17:00, Antti Kantee wrote: > On 11/02/16 15:07, Martin Lucina wrote: > >I'd like to announce 'unikernel-runner', which provides a base image you > >can use to build and run rumprun unikernels as Docker containers: > > Did you consider some less generic name than 'unikernel-runner'? I don't > think the name is reflective of a Docker-specific way to run unikernels. It > will probably end up screwing both those who don't want to use Docker and > those who do want to use it. Reconsidering the name is of course just a > suggestion; what you decide outside of rumpkernel.org is up to you.
The repo name follows the Docker image name, so it's not confusing when used in context as "FROM xxxx/unikernel-runner" in a Dockerfile. Having said that, I'm happy to rename the repo to "docker-unikernel-runner" if you think it'll be less confusing. > (sorry couldn't find any off-by-one errors from your mail so had to pick on > the name) :-)
