On Wednesday, 13.04.2016 at 08:07, Antti Kantee wrote: > On 13/04/16 06:28, David Halls wrote: > >>Probably, but to maximize the potential, a pointer to your work should be > >>available from somewhere else besides the mailing list archives. Suggestions > >>on that? > > > >Not yet. Is the current automatic build stuff (that Martin did) > >pointed to from anywhere? > > Dunno.
Which automatic build stuff? The Travis CI build for rumprun-packages is linked to in rumprun-packages/README, though I guess I should add a note asking package maintainers to subscribe to the rumpkernel-builds list to get notifications? The "unofficial" ready-to-run Docker containers with the rumprun toolchain are documented on the wiki at http://wiki.rumpkernel.org/Howto%3A-Using-prebuilt-Rumprun-toolchains-with-Docker. > builds.rumpkernel.org is one place it could be linked from, at least for > starters, it contains unofficial stuff too. Though, ready-to-use binaries > are something we might want to point to more prominently than just hiding > them on the CI page. ... there's also http://wiki.rumpkernel.org/Builds which has sub-pages for Binary packages and CI. I can add both my autobuild schemes to the relevant pages there if you like (not sure where the Docker container would go or if you want to link to those).
