On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Antti Kantee <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26/07/16 14:55, Neeraj Sharma wrote: >> > >> I believe you are correct but it does complicate the changes required >> in the Erlang package which as it appears favors Linux for its >> internal architecture. Having said that I do believe given sufficient >> publicity (to gain support within the Erlang maint community) and >> enhanced understanding should take care of some of that if not >> everything. > > > Even before taking things to the Erlang community, there should be a strong > understanding of the scenario and tradeoffs. I'd simply not worry about the > Erlang community for now, at least unless you have exceptionally > friendly/casual relationships with them. >
I agree. I am incrementally spending time conceptually to gain a better understanding the internal architecture although like most of the open source software it is not document to make the pain go away, although I don't blame them :) > Again, we can't compete with Linux at their game, simply don't have the > headcount. (then again, one might argue that writing a Unix clone in the > 90's was pointless, but here we are) > I believe it is just a matter of time before the pieces come together. -Neeraj
