[email protected] said: > > So, what is the preferred way to accomplish this? Should we have a > > companion rump_term () to rump_init () for these use cases? > > > > I'm thinking ahead here, where someone might use this as part of library > > functionality, which then gets re-used in unexpected ways. > > The problem is that operating systems don't have a built in way to do > this... You could run the rump kernel in a different process, if that > works for your application.
Doh. You're right about an OS having no "free all resources" operation. Let me re-phrase my question: After successfully calling rump_sys_umount(...), rump_pub_etfs_remove(...) can I be 100% confident that all the data has landed in the underlying file, at least from the PoV of the host kernel? Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho _______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
