On 02/01/15 18:03, Justin Cormack wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Antti Kantee <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/01/15 17:40, Justin Cormack wrote: >>> At present only buildrump.sh is tested with Musl libc. The test box is >>> running Alpine Linux, and it does pass all the tests without any >>> issues. I don't think grsec should have an issue with anything in >>> buildrump.sh, if you get a specific error it would be good to know >>> what causes it. >> >> musl64 half works, fails in these builds: >> http://build.myriabit.eu:8011/waterfall >> >> (or has buildrump.sh simply not been updated after whatever problem was >> fixed?) > > Hmm, yes something has changed, I am now getting grsec issues on both > head and the stable version of buildrump.
I don't see the HEAD version failing with buildbot. Are they different installations? > warning: Cannot call inferior functions, Linux kernel PaX protection > forbids return to non-executable pages! > > At that point the program vanishes in a puff of smoke so gdb not very > helpful. Will have to see if it has a warning only mode. hrmph. I guess you could single-step it and iterate towards the failure point that way. All of the executable code should be loaded by the host (*), so I can't think of anything that would cause that warning. *) except for cases where the in-rump-kernel linker is used, but that's definitely not the case with the standard tests ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
