On 08/01/15 12:40, Hajime Tazaki wrote: > Hi again, > > At Wed, 07 Jan 2015 23:57:26 +0000, > Antti Kantee wrote: > >> Even the rumphijack implementation for NetBSD is version-specific, and >> that hasn't really been a problem in 4 years, so I wouldn't overly worry >> about it. Automated testing will free your soul! > > could you care to elaborate the last sentence, which I might > be interested in ? what kind of testing are you saying ?
The original use case for rump kernels was to aid NetBSD kernel development and testing. To show that rump kernels could be used for that, a large number of varying tests was written. To this day, that fairly sizeable test set is run multiple times per day at releng.netbsd.org (since late 2010 to early 2011). If there are problem with the hijack implementation, the test runs will quickly catch them. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
