Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions -
FAIL"):
...
> I can't easily rerun it by hand, but the cron job is rerunning it
> already. Also our automatic bisector is working on it.
xen.org writes ("[rumpuserxen test] 33434: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED"):
> flight 33434 rumpuserxen real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33434/
>
> Failures :-/ but no regressions.
>
> Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
> test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 5 xen-boot fail pass in 33416
> test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 8 guest-start fail in 33416 pass in
> 33434
The former is nothing to do with the rump kernel code and is due to an
infrastructure problem in the test setup.
The latter is the GPF turning out to be unreproducible.
I guess we should keep an eye out in case it turns out to be a race
rather than a cosmic ray.
Ian.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
rumpkernel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
