* Patrick Walton: > I've floated the idea of using EBML [1], which is a dead simple format > used by Matroska (including WebM).
Out of curiosity, does EBML allow generation of type definitions for ordinary programing languages? This is very difficult for other schema languages based on labeled trees because many constructs which look nice on the schema level map very poorly to traditional type definitions (especially in a nominal type system). _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
