On 17/05/2011, at 3:31 AM, Graydon Hoare wrote: > On 16/05/2011 6:35 AM, john skaller wrote: > >> I'm sure it isn't but without meaning to be rude real programmers have no >> idea what they're >> talking about most of the time so that isn't much of an argument. > > ... > > real programmers would then try to invent the Perpetual Motion Machine > > ... > > ridiculous attempts to support unsustainable religious beliefs > > ... > > Of course they keep producing code that doesn't work. > > If this is how you "don't mean to be rude", you need to work on social > graces. This is intensely rude. If you aren't willing to treat people with > respect, to try to understand their concerns and adapt, you are not welcome.
Please, I deliberately wrote that stuff in a way that was *intended* to indicate I was well aware of the "conduct" issue. Clearly the perpetual motion machine was intended to make fun of the whole thing. The claim about producing code that doesn't work isn't rude. Its a fact. C programs continue to crash from null pointer dereferences. > > I'll let you follow up to the messages in flight, if you care to, but after > that I'm going to have to ask you to leave. Sorry. I gave you a fair warning > about our conduct guidelines and your behavior suggests you either don't want > to, or can't, behave in a respectful manner. Ok, I'll unsubscribe shortly. -- john skaller [email protected] _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
