> Depends on the exact syntax you want, I suppose, but this could be
> done with at most single token lookahead right? Simplest option (no
> lookahead needed):

We'll probably keep the type, which can be arbitrarily complex, in
front of the variable name. We also plan, at least in the
type-deducing variant, to allow destructuring, making the two even
more dissimilar.
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to