Unless we're committed to stay as close to C as possible, I'd move bitwise not (which is rather rare) to something else ('~~' maybe) and use ~ for unique pointers. It's important that we'll use something simple for uniques, as they are expected to be all over the place. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
- [rust-dev] Unique pointer syntax Patrick Walton
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer syntax Rob Arnold
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer syntax Patrick Walton
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer syn... Rob Arnold
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer... Patrick Walton
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique po... Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer syntax Marijn Haverbeke
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer syntax David Herman
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer syn... Erick Tryzelaar
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer syn... Graydon Hoare
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer... David Herman
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer syntax Patrick Walton
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer syntax Graydon Hoare
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer syn... Sebastian Sylvan
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer... Graydon Hoare
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer syn... Rafael Avila de Espindola
- Re: [rust-dev] Unique pointer... Brendan Eich