On 10/28/11 4:39 PM, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
How about "union"? C/C++ programmers will instantly get the gist of it, while probably suspecting that it'll be a safer version of the union construct they're familiar with.
There was a concern that C/C++ programmers would mistake it for the unsafe version. Note that we guarantee C ABI compatibility for records, but we don't for unions.
Additionally, using "union" for enums might look weird... Patrick _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
