Just a couple detail responses: > - Overall: technically strong proposal, but I'm lukewarm about doing it, > and definitely don't want to *now*. In order, I'd prefer to finish > what we've got scoped for the next while, then explore Niko's > sketch, then get to this if we find it necessary.
I agree, and I think Patrick does too. > - If priv {} is class-private, I think this means adding global state to > rust? I'm not sure, but that's what I think 'class private' (vs. > 'instance private') means. If so I'd prefer to rethink that. No global state; by "class-private" it simply means that all instances of the same class can see each other's private fields. They're still instance fields. Dave _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev