On 11/30/11 5:21 PM, Graydon Hoare wrote:
Do you feel (straw-vote) like you'd be sufficiently happy to be able
to override the former group but not the latter? Languages vary on how
far down the rabbit hole of operator overloading they permit, and I
wonder where each proponent of the concept draws the line. The former
group is enough to implement most intuitively-arithmetic-ish types,
which seems to be the big use-case.
I'd probably be happy with the first set. What's important to me is
that custom numeric types and collections feel natural to use.
Niko
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
