----- Original Message ----- > From: "Niko Matsakis" <[email protected]> > To: "Brian Anderson" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 9:08:02 PM > Subject: Re: [rust-dev] runtime libraries and stage1 > I just realized that all this work on getting a good naming scheme for > Rust libraries will probably address backwards compatibility for the > runtime as well...? In other words, we won't need any sort of name > mangling scheme because we'll ship multiple libraries and the older > code > will select the older library (assuming the runtime is not statically > compiled in, which it may well be anyhow). Anyway, I'm sure this has > been discussed before, and I'm just coming late to the party, so I'll > stop writing e-mail and get back to what I was doing...
I don't recall any discussion of how to version the runtime itself, except that we do have some notion of an ABI version. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
