On 1/25/12 12:39 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
The "." was ugly, but doesn't this make the syntatic category of the token dependent on the contents of imported modules? I think this is problematic for IDEs which want to go a bit beyond lexical syntax highlighting.
Yes, this was the counter argument.
We can remove the c variant from the enum_type definition, and the program still compiles (even though this smells like a bug). It keeps compiling if we add a d variant to enum_type. Flagging unused bound variables as error isn't a reliable countermeasure because the variant-now-variable might actually be used.
This is because exhaustiveness checking is not implemented. Niko _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
