----- Original Message ----- > From: "Graydon Hoare" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 1:35:39 PM > Subject: [rust-dev] reorg of os / libc bindings > > Hi, > > - Is this structure roughly ok? Useful? Silly?
I think from an end-user perspective such fine-grained organization is not that useful (you'll always just use the reexported version) but +1 for keeping things neat and clean. > - Should I put windows-specific parts of msvcrt in there as well? I think so. > - Is it wrong to try to "gather up" the bits found in common > between > the ANSI C standard library[2] and the POSIX C standard > library[3]? No opinion. > - Is it wrong to call this library 'core::libc', is something else > better? core::libc is good. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
