Hi Graydon
toula::~/code/rust $ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.7 (Final)
toula::~/code/rust $ make
cfg: shell host triple i686-unknown-linux-gnu
cfg: host for i686-unknown-linux-gnu is i386
cfg: unix-y environment
cfg: using gcc
cfg: no pandoc found, omitting doc/rust.pdf
cfg: no llnextgen found, omitting grammar-verification
cfg: no pandoc found, omitting library doc build
fetch: i686-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/rustc
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./src/etc/get-snapshot.py", line 3, in ?
import os, tarfile, hashlib, re, shutil, sys
ImportError: No module named hashlib
make: *** [i686-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/rustc] Error 1
zsh: 5500 etoula::~/code/rust $ python
Python 2.4.3 (#1, Sep 21 2011, 20:06:00)
[GCC 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-51)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>>
That's at least one problem - it seems we need a Python newer than is on
the system. I'll have a go at fixing that up tonight and send a pull
request through.
Cheers
Grahame
On 28 March 2012 14:50, Graydon Hoare <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are 4 bugs left open on 0.2. The first two (1439 and 1649) I'm not
> clear if we're actually waiting on anything; if everyone's comfortable with
> pushing the residue of those to 0.3 (if there even remains things-to-do on
> them) I will do so.
>
> The second-last (1345) I believe I've completed but need someone with an
> RHEL5 install to test. Just see if you can get the compiler to build at all
> (from source). Wilsonkk reported this but anyone with a RHEL5 machine will
> do. I can spin up a VM if need be, but it'll take a while. CentOS installs
> ... so ... slowly.
>
> The last (2060) just appeared now and seems to do with pretty printing
> some cci tests. I assigned to Niko but really I suspect anyone could fix
> it. I'll look tomorrow if nobody else has picked it off by then.
>
> After that, release candidate artifacts!
>
> -Graydon
>
> (There's already a 0.2 windows installer candidate up, if you want to play
> with
> http://dl.rust-lang.org/dist/**rust-0.2-install.exe<http://dl.rust-lang.org/dist/rust-0.2-install.exe>,
> let me know how well it works. This is not an "official" -- signed --
> release, we're likely to overwrite that with a new image before making an
> announcement, but it was produced from the infrastructure and seems to work
> ok for me.)
> ______________________________**_________________
> Rust-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/rust-dev<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev>
>
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
