On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Niko Matsakis <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wrote this code. I only didn't push it because I couldn't decide what to > do with unspecified return types. i.e., should `fn@() { 3 }` have an > inferred return type of `int`, or be an error (because the return type is > `()`)?
Coming from the felix/ocaml world, I'm a big fan of inference :) Any chance we could infer the return type here, and on normal function declarations as well? _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
