Ah, you mean after repeated invocations of the containing function in case the timeout event keeps firing?
-- Ziad On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote: > * Ziad Hatahet: > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Florian Weimer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> This approach is fundamentally broken. If the timeout ever kicks in, > >> goroutines will pile up without bounds. > > > I just want to be clear on your comment. You mean the goroutines would > pile > > up, or the channel will grow without bounds? > > The goroutines would pile up. >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
