On 8/2/12 10:07 AM, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
fn h() -> int {
f(); // result ignored
g(); // result returned
}
It's true, I feel like the current scheme does a better job of
highlighting when a seemingly unused value is significant.
I don't know, I always liked the current rule regarding final values
and—of all our semicolon rules—it seems the easiest to learn.
Probably the weirdest one is the one which I introduced regarding return
values of what are now called `do` and `for` statements. But that can
(and perhaps should) be separately addressed.
Niko
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
