As a semi-counter point, these are all operations that relate to "bring external functionality into the current scope".
Based on this, what would make the most sense to me is similar though distinct syntax. So something like "use extern …", "use mod …", "use std::…". Those might not be the right ones, but it seems like they should be tied (syntactically) somehow. On Sep 14, 2012, at 8:28 PM, Kevin Cantu wrote: > I'm still not sure why two (or three) distinct actions should try to share > the same syntax. > > Linking to an external library, referring to a module defined outside the > current source file, and adding to the current set of open namespaces seem > different enough to me... > > -Kevin > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
