Patrick Walton wrote:
Oh, in that case I totally agree. I thought Nathan was asking for the purity specified in the function signature to always match the inferred purity of the function--in particular, for the compiler to enforce that a pure function is never marked impure. That was what I was objecting to. If I misinterpreted I apologize.
Hmm, re-reading his post you may have been right. Maybe it's me who was mistaken. :)
Niko _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
