On 01/12/2013 04:51 AM, Matthieu Monrocq wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:21 AM, James Gao <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:and how about these two case: a) fn foo<T1: Ord, Eq, Hash; T2: Ord, ::Eq> (...) {...} b) fn foo<T1: Ord + Eq + Hash, T2: Ord + ::Eq> (...) {...}Really likes b), + looks especially suiting since we are adding up requirements.
Agree, + looks like a nice solution.
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
