James Boyden wrote:
For the above reasons, is there any way that the lifetime syntax could be moved*after* the type? The current proposal of `&'lt Foo` does address the ambiguity described in point 2b, but not 2a or 2c. (The `/` sigil itself actually doesn't faze me that much.)
We considered this, but it's very hard to mix prefix and postfix notation like this without ambiguity. Consider:
&&T/b Is this: &'b &T or &&'b T I suppose we could just resolve it arbitrarily, like if-else-if chains. Niko
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
