On 2/4/13 9:08 PM, Samuel de Framond wrote:
Regarding syntax, since the lifetime is annotating a type, would a
lifetime suffix be feasible? For example, &T is a "pointer to T" and
&T'lt could be a "pointer to type T with a lifetime of lt"
I don't know :/
This was covered earlier. Suffixes tend to cause ambiguity when combined
with prefixes in the type grammar. (Consider as a simple example &&T'lt
-- which & does that lifetime belong to?)
Patrick
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
