There are still a couple things in std that depend on rustrt: arena.rs dbg.rs net_tcp.rs rl.rs test.rs time.rs uv_ll.rs
Can we include moving these into core as part of a rename? I believe that's the one main holdup that is keeping us from breaking std up into external packages. On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Thad Guidry <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for "extra". It has a nice semantic smiley face all over it. > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Patrick Walton <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> There's been consensus lately that `core` and `std` are somewhat >> misnamed. `core` is really the standard library--the one that would be >> specified in a specification if we had one. `std` is an "extras" library >> and may well end up sliced up and moved to various packages. >> >> So it seems prudent to rename `core` to `std`. But that leaves the >> question of what to name `std` in the interim. Options that have been >> suggested are `extra`, `ext`, and `contrib`. >> >> Any other opinions? >> >> Patrick >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Rust-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/rust-dev<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev> >> > > > > -- > -Thad > http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
