On 13-04-24 11:31 AM, Brian Anderson wrote:
This looks amazing. Thanks. Is this grammar suitable to replace the official grammar in the manual? Will we be able to set up some automation around it to validate that it reflects the behavior of the rustc parser, and to keep it up to date?
Yeah. This (automating its inclusion / extraction / testing) is on my 0.7 list for Very Important Stuff.
(Also to John: I didn't comment at the time, but bravo! This is great. So excited to see it. Thanks.)
-Graydon _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
